linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: sanitize __d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1OHcV6-0000oz-C5@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 14:47:52 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	john.johansen@...onical.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: sanitize __d_path()

On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> >
> > __d_path() no longer appends " (deleted)" to unlinked paths.  This is
> > moved into d_path() which is the only caller that cares.
> 
> d_path() or equivalent should get "int *deleted" argument to distinguish
> really deleted files. Then users can decide if they care or not.

Why can't they distinguish deleted files by just calling d_unlinked()?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/