linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] change direct call of spin_lock(anon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100527134631.GB2112@barrios-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 22:46:31 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to
 inline function

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:39:26PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Subject: change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to inline function
> 
> Subsitute a direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) with
> an inline function doing exactly the same.
> 
> This makes it easier to do the substitution to the root
> anon_vma lock in a following patch.
> 
> We will deal with the handful of special locks (nested,
> dec_and_lock, etc) separately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/