[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271008230.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support.
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> >> > And even if it isn't, so what? What's wrong with looping behavior?
> >>
> >> It is a significant power drain.
> >
> > Not in the situation I was discussing.
> >
>
> If you meant it spend most of the time suspended, then I agree. It
> only wastes power when a driver blocks suspend by returning an error
> from its suspend hook and we are forced to loop doing no useful work.
Exactly the same as the in-kernel opportunistic suspend implementation.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists