[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527153548.GB13858@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:35:48 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>, wezhang@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sys_personality: validate personality before
set_personality()
sys_personality(personality) is obviously wrong. It calls set_personality()
which always sets current->personality = personality and then does
if (current->personality != personality)
return -EINVAL;
If this "u_long" argument doesn't fit into "unsigned int" ->personality,
we return -EINVAL but change the caller's ->personality.
Move this check up to ensure the overflow is not possible, before calling
set_personality() which never fails.
Pointed-out-by: Wenming Zhang <wezhang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/exec_domain.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/exec_domain.c~1_CK_OVERFLOW_EARLIER 2009-04-06 00:03:42.000000000 +0200
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/exec_domain.c 2010-05-27 15:15:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -193,9 +193,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(personality, u_long, per
u_long old = current->personality;
if (personality != 0xffffffff) {
- set_personality(personality);
- if (current->personality != personality)
+ if ((unsigned int)personality != personality)
return -EINVAL;
+ set_personality(personality);
}
return (long)old;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists