[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005271911590.5422@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:13:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
HighPoint Linux Team <linux@...hpoint-tech.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/11] drivers/scsi: Eliminate a NULL pointer dereference
On Thu, 27 May 2010, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Dan Carpenter schrieb:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> If it is a problem to use 0 when host is NULL, then the code could be fixed
> >> in another way.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah. It seems like it would be better to give a clearly bogus number.
> > I would have said -1 but "scsi-1" looks normal so maybe something like
> > 9999999?
> >
>
> lets spend some bytes:
>
>
> if (host)
> dprintk("scsi%d: hptiop_probe failed\n",host->host_no);
> else
> dprintk("scsi: no host, hptiop_probe failed\n");
dprintk is defined in hptiop.h as:
#if 0
#define dprintk(fmt, args...) do { printk(fmt, ##args); } while(0)
#else
#define dprintk(fmt, args...)
#endif
So unless someone adjusts the #if 0, there is no code. I guess there is a
danger that adding such an if would actually generate some code?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists