[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271327560.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:29:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:04 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and
> > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no
> > attention to latencies or other requirements.
>
> Those are a whole different beast, those are basically a quick-off
> button like thing. Forced suspend is conceptually a very different beast
> from power-saving a running system.
They may be different conceptually. Nevertheless, Android uses forced
suspend as a form of power saving. Until better mechanisms are in
place, it makes sense.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists