[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271344040.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
<felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Even if we could use suspend-via-deep-idle-state on PCs,
>
> ( see Alan Cox's argument on PCs )
>
> > we still need to be able to enter suspend while the system isn't idle.
>
> _WHY_!?
You close your laptop's lid and throw the machine into a backpack. At
that time you want it to suspend even though it may not be idle.
> We've been trying to tell you you don't need that.
And I'm trying to tell you that you do.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists