lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:54:26 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@...ia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > How so, event happens on hardware level, IRQ gets raised, CPU wakes up, > handler gets run, handler generates a task wakeup, runqueue isn't empty, > we run stuff. If you're using idle-based suspend without any forced idling or blocking of applications then you don't lose wakeups. People keep conflating separate issues. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists