[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274983333.27810.5744.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:02:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:57 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Shall we henceforth stop confusing forced suspend for laptops and
> > powersaving a running system?
>
> If you want to support forced suspend for laptops and you want to avoid
> the risk of losing wakeups then you need in-kernel suspend blockers.
> That's entirely orthogonal to Android's runtime power management.
The simple fact of life is, on PC style hardware suspend is mostly about
missing events. I really _really_ want to miss mouse movement of my
bluetooth mouse when the gear is stowed in my backpack.
Its perfectly OK to miss events on _forced_ suspend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists