[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527200950.44305cef@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:09:50 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg
<arve@...roid.com>, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
> > If one works so does the other.
>
> Not at all. The entire point of opportunistic suspend is that I don't
> care is currently in TASK_RUNNABLE or has a timer that's due to expire
> in 100msec - based on policy (through not having any held suspend
> blockers), I'll go to sleep. That's easily possible on PCs.
Yes I appreciate what suspend blockers are trying to do. Now how does
that connect with my first sentence ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists