[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100527.133559.193700421.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fbl@...close.org
Cc: amwang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gospo@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and
bonding devices
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:05:45 -0300
> I did the following patch to discard the packet if it was IN_NETPOLL
> and the read_lock() fails, so I could go ahead testing it:
This is disgusting, let's just disallow console output from such
locations. Defer them to a workqueue if their output is so critical.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists