[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527215347.431c4934@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:53:47 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
> > The event was not lost.
>
> Not lost, but not delivered. So you need your policy agent to send
it will be delivered next time the process wakes. It's not lost.
> SIGCONT when you receive any wakeup event, which either means proxying
> all your network traffic through your policy agent or having some
> mechanism for alerting the policy agent whenever you leave the deep idle
> state.
You didn't mention that requirement last time.
> > > also the race of an application being in the middle of handling a wakeup
> > > event when you send it the signal.
> >
> > sigmask()
>
> Doesn't help - I may be hit by the signal between the poll() unblocking
> and me having the opportunity to call sigmask().
ppoll(). This is all existing solved stuff.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists