[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005272310.50724.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:10:50 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:29 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > They may be different conceptually. Nevertheless, Android uses forced
> > suspend as a form of power saving. Until better mechanisms are in
> > place, it makes sense.
>
> So let them, doesn't mean we have to merge it. Or will you saw your foot
> off too if google were to promotes it?
Do you have to be offensive to people who disagree with you?
Alan simply wants to understand the _technical_ objections that people have
to this patchset and you're not helping. So, could you please explain what
exactly is your technical objection to it?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists