[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fx1cgbe0.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:42:15 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
Linux@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> - Given a non forced (that is 'idle down') transition to a suspend level
> we can implement a 'suspend as idle' on many embedded platforms in a
> manner which is not racy at kernel level. Apparently implemented
> already on ARM
Just to confirm, yes, it is already implemeted on ARM, and in mainline
for the TI OMAP3 (ARM Cortex-A8) and in commercial products (Nokia
N900, Moto Droid, Palm Pre, Archos, etc.) For the OMAP the deepest
C-state is actually a fully powered-down ARM core.
While the Droid uses 'suspend as idle' in addition to opportunistic
suspend, the N900 *never* suspends in the traditional sense, it is
entirely idle based.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists