[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527071429.58fa81ac@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:14:29 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:09:43 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> We now have suggestions how to do the job properly so the right thing is
> probably to go and explore those suggestions not merge crap.
>
> Merging crap won't help anyway. The rest of the kernel community can
> still simply stonewall those interfaces, and a volunteer community has
> ways of dealing with abuse of process, notably by simply not getting
> around to, or implementing things directly contrary to the crap bits.
>
> So it's not even in the interest of people to play political games. Even
> if you get away with in the short term the people who rely on the junk
> will end up out on a limb and holding the baby when the crap hits the fan
> (see reiserfs)
>
> Alan
I'm not interested in "abusing processes". I just think, this is in
limbo for too long already.
Just decide something. One way or the other. The world will continue.
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists