[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100528093025.GE24058@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:30:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor
* Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 01:49 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Arjan van de Ven<arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> >>[Version 2 includes the acks/etc. Andrew: no changes from the patches that
> >>are in -mm]
> >>
> >>There have been various reports of the ondemand governor causing some
> >>serious performance issues, one of the latest ones from Andrew. There are
> >>several fundamental issues with ondemand (being worked on), but the report
> >>from Andrew can be fixed relatively easily.
> >>
> >>The fundamental issue is that ondemand will go to a (too) low CPU frequency
> >>for workloads that alternatingly disk and CPU bound...
> >
> >I've applied your series to sched/core and started testing it, thanks Arjan!
>
> This code seems to help significantly with some workloads,
> allowing more systems to use the ondemand governor (and
> having fewer systems waste power by using the performance
> governor all the time).
>
> It would be nice to see it in 2.6.35
Yeah, it's uptream now :-)
Cheers,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists