[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTill8Y1RNTzZ9BFmVHPxLyx7CZIL5okqUCRVrrmH@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 18:00:32 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mszeredi@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] splice: fix updating sd->pos wrongly
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Changli Gao wrote:
>> fix updating sd->pos wrongly.
>>
>> In error path, we don't need to updating sd->pos, if the file isn't seekable.
>
> This patch is nonsense. Why should we handle sd->pos != 0 case
> differently?
>
If the in file isn't seekable, its splice_read won't update *ppos, so
in the error path, we'd better not change it too. Otherwise, some
assumption will go wrong.
ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
unsigned int flags)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct tcp_splice_state tss = {
.pipe = pipe,
.len = len,
.flags = flags,
};
long timeo;
ssize_t spliced;
int ret;
/*
* We can't seek on a socket input
*/
if (unlikely(*ppos))
return -ESPIPE;
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists