[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBmZej_rQFQ_bMPJf9GGJFFW3zdnpqZTXZCIfc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:36:36 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mszeredi@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] splice: fix updating sd->pos wrongly
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Changli Gao wrote:
>> Before checking the sd->pos, sd->pos
>> already is updated with the value returned by splice_read(), so if in
>> file is seekabble, sd->pos is non-zero when I checking it.
>
> I see the logic now. But it's really confusing, at least some
> comments would be needed.
>
> But I think it would be better not to try reusing sd->pos for reading,
> but supplying an "loff_t *read_ppos" to splice_direct_to_actor and
> leaving sd->pos alone (for the write side to use and update as
> necessary).
>
if (ret < read_len) {
I think is much like a hack too. :)
- sd->pos = prev_pos + ret;
+ if (sd->pos)
+ sd->pos = prev_pos + ret;
goto out_release;
}
Anyway, it can fix the issue I mentioned above. Any future cleanup
should not be mixed in, IMO.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists