linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Provide local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 May 2010 15:42:33 +0200
From:	Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Provide local_clock() and improve
 documentation

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:13:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> + * The !IRQ-safetly of sched_clock() and sched_clock_cpu() comes from things

typo                ^

Thank you for adding documentation.  I have one additional
question regarding wrapping of sched_clock().  I know it is
used for timestamps in ftrace and printk, so it's desirable
that it never wraps.  But on several embedded systems
it wraps after a few hours.  Bug or just a minor flaw?
If someone knows it would be nice to get that documented, too.

See also
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/340


Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/