[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinoTgYfywq1S6UV-n7npzk4xyQZ2PMT5LDkaBCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 00:35:50 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, williams@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 00:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> I think highest RT proirity ins't good solution.
>> As I mentiond, Some RT functions don't want to be preempted by other processes
>> which cause memory pressure. It makes RT task broken.
>
> All the patches I've seen use MAX_RT_PRIO-1, which is actually FIFO-1,
> which is the lowest RT priority.
Stupid me. I confused that until now.
That's exactly what I want.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists