linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005271807470.11382@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 18:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree



On Fri, 28 May 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Caused by commit 0ac0c0d0f837c499afd02a802f9cf52d3027fa3b ("cpusets:
> randomize node rotor used in cpuset_mem_spread_node()").
> 
> This commit assumes that __node_random() exists if (MAX_NUMNODES > 1) and
> uses it if CONFIG_CPUSETS is set, but only creates it for x86 ...  there
> is at least one other architecture where those conditions are true.

Yeah, looking at that, it seems totally idiotic.

Why is that "__node_random()" in x86 code at all? There is absolutely 
nothing x86 about it that I can tell. And now I have an ia64 merge that 
just duplicates that moronic function.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/