[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100528114003.7E1B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:51:27 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary variables in shrink_zone()
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:32AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:51:26AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > Two variables are declared that are unnecessary in shrink_zone() as they
> > > > already exist int the scan_control. Remove them
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > >
> > > ok.
> > > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> > You confuse me, you added the local variables yourself in 01dbe5c9
> > for performance reasons. Doesn't that still hold?
>
> To avoid a potential regression, I've dropped the patch.
I'm ok either.
Commit 01dbe5c9 issue was only observed on ia64. so it's not important.
But at making 01dbe5c9 time, I didn't realized this stack overflow issue.
So, I thought "Oh, It's no risk. should go!".
but if stack reducing is important, I'm ok to drop this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists