[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100529160915.051ab19f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 16:09:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
> Could we have write(powerstate_fd, "qos",3) block until all
> QOS_EVENTUALLY constraints are lifted or the system successfully
> suspends and resumes or a signal arrives?
Yes - and you can then use alarm() or similar to do timeouts (or write
the timeout to the fd ?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists