linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [patch] complain when users abuse the pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C019D36.8070405@crca.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 30 May 2010 09:03:18 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	markgross@...gnar.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [patch] complain when users abuse the pm_qos API

Hi.

On 30/05/10 06:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 29 May 2010, mark gross wrote:
>> The following patch is to help clean up API abusers of pm_qos where
>> they call update_request before registering a request.
>>
>> --mgross
>>
>> --Signed-off-by: markgross<markgross@...gnar.org>
>
> Will there be a big issue if I push this during the next merge window?

What's the point to the patch? That is: why is calling update_request 
before registering a request such a big problem that it demands a WARN() 
and dump stack?

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/