linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 17/17] writeback: lessen sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1275120210.2668.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 29 May 2010 11:03:30 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 17/17] writeback: lessen sync_supers wakeup count

On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> void mark_sb_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> 	sb->s_dirty = 1;
> 
> 	if (!supers_timer_armed) {
> 		spin_lock(&supers_timer_lock);
> 		if (!supers_timer_armed) {
> 			bdi_arm_supers_timer();
> 			supers_timer_armed = 1;
> 		}
> 	} else if (supers_timer_armed == -1)
> 		spin_lock(&supers_timer_lock);
> 		if (supers_timer_armed == -1)
> 			supers_timer_armed = 1;
> 		spin_unlock(&supers_timer_lock);
> 	}
> }
> 
> I didn't try very hard there, but you get the idea: examine the state
> before taking that expensive global spinlock, so we only end up taking
> the lock once per five seconds, rather than once per possible
> superblock dirtying.  That's like a six-orders-of-magnitude reduction
> in locking frequency, which is worth putting some effort into.

Andrew, thanks for review!

I just did not consider spinlock to be expensive because I thought that
marking superblock as dirty is a relatively rare operation. And my small
experiments kind of confirmed that.

But  Nick suggested a good locking scheme which uses only smp_mb() in
this thread, which I am going to stick with.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/