linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] revised patch for arch/tile/ support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201005291329.10941.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Sat, 29 May 2010 13:29:10 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] revised patch for arch/tile/ support

On Saturday 29 May 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On May 20 I wrote:
> > At Tilera we have been running Linux 2.6.26 on our architecture for a
> > while and distributing the sources to our customers.  We just sync'ed up
> > our sources to 2.6.34 and would like to return it to the community more
> > widely, so I'm hoping to take advantage of the merge window for 2.6.35
> > to integrate support for our architecture.
> 
> Thanks to some much-appreciated volunteer work reviewing that initial
> patch, I now have a revised set of patches which I would like to offer
> for submission to the mainline.

It seems that you have addressed all my review comments and all the
other comments that I have seen in the best possible ways.
All the controversial parts from the original code are either corrected
or (in case of nonessential drivers) deferred to a future review.
I did not expect this to be possibly in such a short time, and it
continues to amaze me.

Consequently, I fully support this series to go into 2.6.35.
To the entire series:

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/