[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005302227130.19253@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:27:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kernel: Use GFP_ATOMIC when a lock is held
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
The containing function is called from several places. At one of them, in
the function untag_chunk, the spin lock &entry->lock is held.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@gfp exists@
identifier fn;
position p;
@@
fn(...) {
... when != spin_unlock
when any
GFP_KERNEL@p
... when any
}
@locked@
identifier gfp.fn;
@@
spin_lock(...)
... when != spin_unlock
fn(...)
@depends on locked@
position gfp.p;
@@
- GFP_KERNEL@p
+ GFP_ATOMIC
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static struct audit_chunk *alloc_chunk(i
int i;
size = offsetof(struct audit_chunk, owners) + count * sizeof(struct node);
- chunk = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ chunk = kzalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!chunk)
return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists