[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005302227470.19253@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:28:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arch/s390/kvm: Use GFP_ATOMIC when a lock is held
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
The containing function is called from several places. At one of them, in
the function __sigp_stop, the spin lock &fi->lock is held.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@gfp exists@
identifier fn;
position p;
@@
fn(...) {
... when != spin_unlock
when any
GFP_KERNEL@p
... when any
}
@locked@
identifier gfp.fn;
@@
spin_lock(...)
... when != spin_unlock
fn(...)
@depends on locked@
position gfp.p;
@@
- GFP_KERNEL@p
+ GFP_ATOMIC
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int __inject_sigp_stop(struct kvm
{
struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti;
- inti = kzalloc(sizeof(*inti), GFP_KERNEL);
+ inti = kzalloc(sizeof(*inti), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!inti)
return -ENOMEM;
inti->type = KVM_S390_SIGP_STOP;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists