linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100530201738.GB2498@liondog.tnic>
Date:	Sun, 30 May 2010 22:17:38 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

> > This bothers me, because it really feels like something is fundamentally
> > broken in UML tryingto track the upstream architecture, and this is just
> > a bandage.
> 
> First of all, scratch that patch. It is indeed dumb idea to sprinkle UML
> special cases in x86 just because they include it.
> 
> Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone
> provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it
> is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to
> redirect hweight stuff properly...

Ok, AFAICT UML is sucking in the includes of the sub-architecture the
UML "guest" is running on. See below¹ for the whole gcc string make
executes. Among the switches is

"-I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include"

so there will be no untangling today. Instead, we could do another
bandaid which is confined to UML include space only and redirect
arch_hweight.h includes to the generic ones. Check this out, it seems to
work here:

--
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:11:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery
introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d
(x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127522065202435&w=2

Redirect arch_hweight.h include from the x86 portion to the generic
arch_hweight.h which is a fallback to the software hweight routines.

LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foerster@....de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
---
 arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h

diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h b/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c656cf4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_UM_HWEIGHT_H
+#define _ASM_UM_HWEIGHT_H
+
+#include <asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h>
+
+#endif
-- 
1.7.1









¹ gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/um/sys-x86_64/.delay.o.d  -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.4/include -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/um/include -Iinclude  -include include/generated/autoconf.h -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/um/sys-x86_64 -m64 -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Os -D__arch_um__ -DSUBARCH=\"x86_64\" -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/um/include/shared -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/um/sys-x86_64/shared -I/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/um/include/shared/skas -Dvmap=kernel_vmap -Din6addr_loopback=kernel_in6addr_loopback -Din6addr_any=kernel_in6addr_any -fno-builtin -m64 -funit-at-a-time -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -Derrno=kernel_errno -Dsigprocmask=kernel_sigprocmask -Dmktime=kernel_mktime -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-stack-protector -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm -fconserve-stack   -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=\#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(delay)"  -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(delay)"  -c -o arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.o arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/