[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100531084709.GA7784@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:47:09 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mmc: add an ioctl for erasing
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:45:37AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Sorry for the slow reply, I have been away.
>
> Connecting erase to discard was rejected for performance reasons in 2008.
> Refer:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/25378/focus=25606
The discard implementation changed a lot since those days. Discard
requests now have their own request size limitation which is separate
form that for normal requests, and we also store the alignment
requirement for them separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists