[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C038841.1010507@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:58:25 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: add hooks for workqueue
Hello, Peter.
On 05/31/2010 10:01 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:48 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Concurrency managed workqueue needs to know when workers are going to
>> sleep and waking up, and, when a worker goes to sleep, be able to wake
>> up another worker to maintain adequate concurrency. This patch
>> introduces PF_WQ_WORKER to identify workqueue workers and adds the
>> following two hooks.
>>
>> * wq_worker_waking_up(): called when a worker is woken up.
>>
>> * wq_worker_sleeping(): called when a worker is going to sleep and may
>> return a pointer to a local task which should be woken up. The
>> returned task is woken up using try_to_wake_up_local() which is
>> simplified ttwu which is called under rq lock and can only wake up
>> local tasks.
>
> This changelog seems to lack explanation for why you need the wakeup
> callback.
Because cmwq "needs to know when workers are going to sleep and waking
up, and, when a worker goes to sleep, be able to wake up another
worker to maintain adequate concurrency". Sure, I can add more but
again forward reference here would work pretty well when digging
through history.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists