[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTil8LHjRT_PMosymmtBb1pxIzkBaWC0ef35DCBUU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:02:19 +0500
From: Shaz <shazalive@...il.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
securityengineeringresearchgroup
<securityengineeringresearchgroup@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] EVM
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:20 AM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
>> Much appreciation to Dave Hansen, Serge Hallyn, and Matt Helsley for
>> reviewing the patches.
>
> We're not seeing much comment on this code beyond the folk above. It
> might help to cc fsdevel.
>
> Also, I raised some issues:
>
> I'd also be interested to know what kind of user demand there is for EVM
> -- are there any specific instances of user requirements which are met
> by it? Do any distros plan to enable and support it?
>
> and does this code meet the requirements of potential users such as Meego ?
EVM is based on EA while Aegis does not use EA as far as I can
understand from the documentation available. Can we make EVM
independent of EA? Even the MAC mechanism is very different then
existing LSM based mechanisms.
--
Shaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists