linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup, take 4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100531.043056.258120791.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 04:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fthain@...egraphics.com.au
Cc:	geert@...ux-m68k.org, joe@...ches.com, p_gortmaker@...oo.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup,
 take 4

From: fthain@...egraphics.com.au
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:07:09 +1000 (EST)

> Apparently David now wants me to submit this again --
> 
> if (ei_debug)
> 	pr_debug(...)
> 
> David, if that code is acceptable, please let me know.

The only thing I care about is at the moment that you don't do
something that ends up dropping the pr_fmt prefix.

The pr_fmt define at the beginning of the driver is for nothing
if we end up adding exceptions that end up eliding it for no
good reason.  And that's what your patch was doing.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/