linux-kernel - Re: commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 15:56:49 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task

On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 09:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > sched: RT waker sync wakeup bugfix
> > 
> > An RT waker's weight is not on the runqueue, but we try to subrtact it anyway
> > in the sync wakeup case,  sending this_load negative.  This leads to affine
> > wakeup failure in cases where it should succeed.  This was found while testing
> > an PREEMPT_RT kernel with lmbench's lat_udp.  In a PREEMPT_RT kernel, softirq
> > threads act as a ~proxy for the !RT buddy.  Approximate !PREEMPT_RT sync wakeup
> > behavior by looking at the buddy instead, and subtracting the maximum task weight
> > that will not send this_load negative. 
> 
> 
> Does the below work?

Had to make a dinky adjustment for x86-tip-rt33, but yeah, the horrid
latencies are gone.  (hm, skinnier than expected too)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/