[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1275314209.17599.7.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:56:49 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 09:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > sched: RT waker sync wakeup bugfix
> >
> > An RT waker's weight is not on the runqueue, but we try to subrtact it anyway
> > in the sync wakeup case, sending this_load negative. This leads to affine
> > wakeup failure in cases where it should succeed. This was found while testing
> > an PREEMPT_RT kernel with lmbench's lat_udp. In a PREEMPT_RT kernel, softirq
> > threads act as a ~proxy for the !RT buddy. Approximate !PREEMPT_RT sync wakeup
> > behavior by looking at the buddy instead, and subtracting the maximum task weight
> > that will not send this_load negative.
>
>
> Does the below work?
Had to make a dinky adjustment for x86-tip-rt33, but yeah, the horrid
latencies are gone. (hm, skinnier than expected too)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists