linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup, take 4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jun 2010 01:19:06 +1000 (EST)
From:	Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	joe@...ches.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, p_gortmaker@...oo.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup,
 take 4


On Mon, 31 May 2010, David Miller wrote:

> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:13 -0700
> 
> > There are many uses of KERN_DEBUG that are reasonable to have always 
> > enabled.
> 
> Doubtful.
> 
> pr_debug() makes a ton of sense as currently implemented. It's for 
> messages that we want both compile time and run-time control over.
> 
> The case we have here in mac8390 seems like it should stay as pr_info().  
> Because 1) it's already controlled by a run-time knob so controlling it 
> even further is confusing and 2) the message is "informative", it lets 
> the user know a feature cannot be enabled, thus pr_info().

If that is true in general, then ei_debug itself becomes questionable.

In the case of mac8390 at least, I'm certainly leaning toward changing the 
pr_info (conditional on ei_debug) to pr_debug (unconditional).

Finn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/