linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 pci: Add option to not assign BAR's if not already assigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 09:36:41 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 pci: Add option to not assign BAR's if not already
 assigned

On 05/31/2010 04:12 AM, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
> BIOS still assigns the MMIO BAR's so the devices are alive.

OK, so it sounds like the *real* problem is our behavior on address
space exhaustion: it is rather common that a driver will only use one
BAR/address space, and sometimes can even choose which address space to
use.  The right thing would be to defer error until a particular BAR is
requested by the device driver, but I'm not sure if our interfaces
permits that (and I'm on my way to the airport right now so I can't
check...)

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/