linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] perf tools: Make target to generate self contained source tarball

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 20:06:50 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] perf tools: Make target to generate self
	contained source tarball

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:42:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg escreveu:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:53:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Hi Michal, Sam,
> > > 
> > > 	Are you OK with with this change?
> > 
> > No - I do not like it :-)
> > 
> > But I like the concept.
> > 
> > We have some minimal infrastructure to support packaging
> > and this seems like an OK fit for this too.
> > Only drawback is that you need to configure your kernel
> > before you can pack the source tarball.
> > 
> > Moving the packaging support to scripts/package/
> > avoiding any changes to the top-level Makefile.
> 
> What about this one?
> 
> It touches one line in the top level Makefile, but that can be
> considered not perf specific, i.e. if building source tarballs
> (-src-pkg suffixed targets) is considered useful, and I think it is,
> then that can be used for building source tarballs with some processing,
> i.e. adding the HEAD to the tarball being generated, like I'm doing
> for perf.

Both the top-level Makefile change and the package stuff can be considered:

Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/