[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006010023220.2933@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:27:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
tytso@....edu, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 31 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > So that allows to use the same mechanism for more than the android
> > sledge hammer approach and confines the controversial use cases into
> > android specific files without adding a hard to maintain user space
> > interface which would prevent or at least make it hard to do some of
> > the above mentioned things which we want to see implemented.
>
> I generally agree.
>
> I think the Alan Stern's recent proposal goes along these lines, but it has
> the advantage of being a bit more specific. ;-)
Yes, Alan Stern's proposal is going into that direction and I'm not
opposed. Just wanted to get the overall picture straight for James :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists