[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100531231145.GA4093@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:11:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf stat: add perf stat -B to pretty print large
numbers
Em Mon, May 31, 2010 at 04:49:02PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu escreveu:
> the same places, -B or not -B. I was sort of expecting that the first
> example wouldn't have commas in it, or something? Or were those two
Right, from a quick read it seems you saw a bug in the changeset and I
saw none in the patch itself.
I've read the intent, tested the patches, found it matched the intent,
happily applied the patch with a confusing/wrong comment, too bad :-\
> examples *supposed* to be identical, and there's a not-shown 3rd example
> that shows what you get if you use -B and set the LC_NUMERIC variable?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists