[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006011525.39293.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:25:38 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Brandon Philips <brandon@...p.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained.
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 03:08:42 pm Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:31:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >@@ -783,9 +787,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(delete_module, const cha
> > /* Store the name of the last unloaded module for diagnostic purposes */
> > strlcpy(last_unloaded_module, mod->name, sizeof(last_unloaded_module));
> > ddebug_remove_module(mod->name);
> >+
> >+ /* free_module doesn't want module_mutex held by caller. */
> >+ mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> > free_module(mod);
> >-
> >- out:
> >+ goto out_stop;
>
> As Stephen found in linux-next, this line doesn't pass compiling.
> I think this line should be just deleted.
Yep, I didn't commit my fixes to the backport before pushing & posting;
I've done that now. You can get the usable one from the git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6 modules
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists