linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Psychovisually-optimized HZ setting (2.6.33.3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1OJP07-00029Z-Cb@webmail02.domeneshop.no>
Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:47:15 +0200
From:	uwaysi.bin.kareem@...adoxuncreated.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Psychovisually-optimized HZ setting (2.6.33.3)

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:21:46 +0200, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:

> On Sat, 29 May 2010 13:54:00 +0200,  
> uwaysi.bin.kareem@...adoxuncreated.com said:
>
>> Valdis Kletnieks: Why 3956, and why better than 1000:
>>
>> As stated the exact value 3956, fits a profile of "where the human  
>> senses register the most information".
>
> More details on that profile. Where *exactly* did the number 3956 come  
> from?
> How did you distinguish between 3956 and 4000 or 4096?  What numbers do  
> you
> have that show an actual *measurable* improvement over 1000?
>
> In other words, convince us that people can actually see the difference
> between 1000 and 3956.

I do not really have any numbers Valdis, other than simple glxgears benchmarks.
However I have a lot of experience with jitter, and I am looking for sporadic jitter, jitter related to application-startup, jitter that is more or less constant.

Ofcourse I do not need any numbers either. If you think 1000 is better than 50, then there is a difference between 1000 and 4000 aswell.
However it gets in the the area of research, one would call psychovisuals. Small changes affecting the immersion, or experience of opengl.

Put it simply one might state "If you feel that your computer is a bit stoopid, try increasing the value, and maybe you will be more satisfied." This because the computer now, is more like the human senses.

The advanced version:
For those who posess religious knowledge, or believe in religious phenomea, lets just say that, if you don't comply to certain religious knowledge, you will be tuning psychovisuals for a spirit, and not a human, and the experience will be suboptimal. 

Just like the worshipper of one spirit, say, atheist, includes his preferences in the tuning, so does, for instance the hash-smoker, and that is reflected in his tunings. What one would optimally like, is a spirit-free tuning. No personal preference, but tuned for the universal in us all. 

And for those who would like to understand some of the methology behind this, again www.paradoxuncreated.com .Try the meditation-techinque, which purifies the mind from spirits.

Any answers related to this post, critisising or wasting my time, will be ignored.

God guides and deludes whomever he wills.
Peace Be with You.
Uwaysi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/