[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100601105055.GN3564@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:50:56 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
"drbd-dev@...bit.com" <drbd-dev@...bit.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Jun 01 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> HI Jens,
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:45:15 +0200 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> >
> > So the pipe patches were the same, the problem was that a fix for a
> > missing pipe_unlock() had gone into mainline and for-linus/for-next
> > weren't synced up to that. I'm guessing you pull drbd before for-next
> > and that is why it showed up there.
>
> Actually, I merge the drbd tree after the block tree and this fell to the
> drbd tree only because your for-next branch had not been updated (and I
> don't merge your for-linus branch).
Ah I see, then it all adds up.
> > BTW, I would recommend moving for-next from the block tree up before any
> > potential other trees being based off it if that is the case.
>
> That is already true.
Good!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists