[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100601162929.GC32708@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:29:30 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wrong DIF guard tag on ext2 write
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:49:51AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > I agree that a block based retry would close all the holes ... it just
> > doesn't look elegant to me that the fs will already be repeating the I/O
> > if it changed the page and so will block.
>
> We might not ever repeat the IO. We might change the page, write it,
> change it again, truncate the file and toss the page completely.
Why does it matter that it was never written in that case?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists