[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275413650.27810.27930.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:34:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree: undo augmented damage -v2
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:00 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> > I am not seeing how this can cover all the callbacks we will need to
> > maintain the augmented tree property. May be I am missing something.
>
> Yes, indeed, how about the below delta, which my eevdf code did do but I
> overlooked on the conversion to the PAT code.
>
> That removes the break as you said, but also adds code to update the
> child nodes when walking up the path.
>
> So in your rotation case:
>
> G P
> / \ --> / \
> P U N G
> / <-- \
> N U
>
> Say we take the right rotation, then the traversal up from N to P will
> find that since N was the left child of P and it has a right child (G)
> it will also update G.
Hmm, that looks like it could well be folded in to the generic code..
let me spin a new patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists