linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] remove useless ISA_DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100601182452.GA3564@kernel.dk>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:24:52 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] remove useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD

On Mon, May 31 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This patchset removes useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD:
> 
> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD is irrelevant to the majority of architectures but
>   they have to define it.
> 
> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD definition is inconsistent on architectures; ISA
>   DMA addressing restriction, DMA addressing restriction or something
>   else.
> 
> - Everyone (except for SCSI) uses dma_mask instead of ancient
>   ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD.
> 
> Only SCSI uses ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD for ancient drivers with non-zero
> unchecked_isa_dma. We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in
> SCSI. So we can clean up ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD on the whole tree.

Looks good. James, it's probably easier if I just carry this patch set.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/