[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100601221230.7f7d892b@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 22:12:30 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: markgross@...gnar.org, 640e9920@...il.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 22:00:35 +0200
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:05:19 -0700
> mark gross <640e9920@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Only works 1/2 the time, but I like the idea!
> > It fails to get the righ answer when constraints are reduced. But, this
> > idea is a good improvement i'll roll into the next pm_qos update!
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > --mgross
>
> outch. shure. i had the binary block/unblock case in my mind. (where
> the comparitor would be just the logical &&)
And even there it wouldn't work in general. What about keeping the list
sorted? (Or using the rbtree implementation). Well, I'm getting some
sleep and tomorrow I will think about it some more.
> cheers,
> Flo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists