[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100601212556.GD14072@lenovo>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:25:56 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf, x86: Segregate PMU workaraunds into
x86_pmu_quirk_ops structure
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
...
>
> So I guess plain test may be more-less fine here, hmm?
>
> -- Cyrill
> ---
> perf, x86: Make a second write to performance counter when needed
>
> On Netburst cpu we need a second write to performance counter to
> be sure it's updated properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
...
Ping? Any objections/ideas on this approach?
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists