linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:42:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	"Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:15:29PM -0400, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The reason why these bugs occur is that we sprinkle multiple `return'
> > statements inside the middle of non-trivial functions.  People miss
> > some or fail to modify some when later changing locking rules and we
> > gain bugs (or, similarly, resource leaks).
> 
> Right. I changed that in Julia's patch too before merging it into my
> tree. It is already in -tip. See
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/84fe6c19e4a598e8071e3bd1b2c923454eae1268

Thanks.  That looks fine.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/