[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C062928.8040003@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:49:28 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Tom Lyon <pugs@...co.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de,
aafabbri@...co.com, scofeldm@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers
On 06/02/2010 12:45 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:41:55PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 01:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>
>>> Main difference is that vhost works fine with unlocked
>>> memory, paging it in on demand. iommu needs to unmap
>>> memory when it is swapped out or relocated.
>>>
>>>
>> So you'd just take the memory map and not pin anything. This way you
>> can reuse the memory map.
>>
>> But no, it doesn't handle the dirty bitmap, so no go.
>>
> IOMMU mapped memory can not be swapped out because we can't do demand
> paging on io-page-faults with current devices. We have to pin _all_
> userspace memory that is mapped into an IOMMU domain.
>
vhost doesn't pin memory.
What I proposed is to describe the memory map using an object (fd), and
pass it around to clients that use it: kvm, vhost, vfio. That way you
maintain the memory map in a central location and broadcast changes to
clients. Only a vfio client would result in memory being pinned.
It can still work, but the interface needs to be extended to include
dirty bitmap logging.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists