[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100602101621.GA8845@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:16:21 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: push down BKL into .locked_ioctl
> Ok, here comes the first step. Can you be more specific
> about what you mean with the open and release methods?
> Do you mean the sg.c and bsg.c chrdev file operations?
No, the open and release methods in struct block_device_operations.
After this the driver API for block devices is BKL free, which
is an important step. To get there the locking in blkdev_get/put
needs to be sorted out first, though.
The ioctl pushdown patch looks good to me, btw.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists